PMXT Counterfactual Replay v1 — Engine and Resolution-Zone Protocol Comparison
Per-(engine/mechanic, leverage, class) summary statistics from two counterfactual simulation experiments on 13,000+ resolved Polymarket binary-event markets. E2 compares three margin-engine variants on survivability and drawdown; E3 compares four resolution-zone mechanics (R0–R3) on final-hour liquidation rates, bad-debt frequency, and average PnL. Bundle 2 of the PMXT family; companion to Paper 1 of the Event-Linked Perpetuals research programme.
Per-(engine/mechanic, leverage, event class) summary statistics from two counterfactual simulation experiments run on the resolved-market subset of the pmxt-stylized-facts-v1 corpus. Released as the empirical companion to Paper 1 of the Event-Linked Perpetuals research programme. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20108387
Experiments
E2 — Margin formula recalibration (CC-007b)
Three engine variants compared on survivability, drawdown, and trader PnL across leverages 1×–10×.
Engine
Description
E0
Baseline — constant volatility estimate, no dynamic margin
E1
EMA-vol — exponential moving average vol, dynamic margin
E2
Recalibrated — vol term without index-price multiplier (CC-007b)
E3 — Resolution-zone protocol comparison (CC-008)
Four resolution-zone mechanics compared on final-hour liquidation rates, bad-debt frequency, and average PnL across leverages 2×–10×.
Mechanic
Description
R0
Naive forced expiry — no resolution-zone rules
R1
Leverage compression only — max leverage ramps to 1× over final hour